Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:55
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Why does he text me first but when I never text first he gets mad?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Should women be allowed in “combat roles” within the military?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Mars’ Mysterious Dark Streaks Are NOT Caused by Water! Here’s the Real Story - The Daily Galaxy
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Tensions rise as Patrick slams Abbott’s veto of THC ban: ‘Legalizes marijuana in Texas’ - KHOU
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
In space, no one can hear you scream — But it still gets incredibly noisy - Salon.com
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.